Skip to main content

Duct sizing calculator

Equal-friction sizing for round and rectangular ductwork, solving Colebrook–White to convergence rather than reading a wheel drawn for one material.

The friction chart's own basis. The default for most UK ductwork.

Round duct

340 mm

Exact diameter required

Velocity

5.50 m/s

At that diameter

Reynolds

1.24e+5

Turbulent

Friction factor

0.0187

Colebrook, iterated

Rectangular equivalents

Sizes whose circular equivalent meets or exceeds 340 mm, in 50 mm increments, capped at 4:1. Closest match first.

Size (w × h)Aspect ratioCircular equivalentOversize
400 × 250 mm1.6:1343 mm+0.9%
550 × 200 mm2.8:1352 mm+3.4%
350 × 300 mm1.2:1354 mm+4.0%
350 × 350 mm1.0:1383 mm+12.5%
400 × 400 mm1.0:1437 mm+28.5%
450 × 450 mm1.0:1492 mm+44.6%

Preliminary sizing for schematic design. Not construction information: it takes no account of fittings, balancing, acoustics, the available ceiling void, or the fan pressure the index run actually needs.

Method and sources

Equations used

Δp/L = f · ρV² ÷ (2 D_h)

Darcy–Weisbach. ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals duct-design chapter, Eq. (19).

1/√f = −2 log₁₀[ ε/(3.7 D_h) + 2.51/(Re √f) ]

Colebrook, Eq. (20). Implicit in f, so iterated to convergence; Swamee–Jain provides the starting estimate only.

Re = D_h V ÷ (1000 ν)

Eq. (22). Below Re 2000 the flow is laminar and f = 64/Re instead, independent of roughness.

D_e = 1.30 (ab)^0.625 ÷ (a+b)^0.250

Huebscher (1948), Eq. (25) — circular equivalent of a rectangular duct for equal flow, resistance and length. Not the hydraulic diameter; the two are not interchangeable.

Constants assumed

SymbolValueSource
ρ (standard air)1.204 kg/m³ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals, duct-design chapter
ν (standard air)1.506 × 10⁻⁵ m²/sImplied by the chapter's own Re = 66.4·D_h·V shortcut for standard air
μ (standard air)1.813 × 10⁻⁵ Pa·sρ × ν, derived from the two rows above
ε galvanised steel0.09 mmASHRAE Table 1 — also the basis of the published friction chart
ε smooth (aluminium, PVC, carbon steel)0.03 mmASHRAE Table 1
ε flexible, fabric and wire3.0 mm categoryASHRAE Table 1

Sources

  • •ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals, duct-design chapter — Darcy–Weisbach, Colebrook, Reynolds number, the Huebscher circular equivalent, Table 1 roughness factors and the standard-air basis.
  • •Colebrook (1938–39) and Huebscher (1948), as cited by that chapter.
  • •Note an inconsistency within the source itself: Table 1 gives flexible metallic duct as 1.2–2.1 mm fully extended, while the chapter's body text says 0.1–2.1 mm. Table 1 is used here.

What this calculator deliberately does not do

Stainless steel is not offered as a material.

ASHRAE Table 1 does not list it and no substitute published table was obtained. Rather than assign a plausible-looking roughness, it is left out. Stainless is generally smoother than galvanised, so the 0.03 mm smooth figure would be a defensible sensitivity check — but that is a judgement for you to make, not a number this tool should assert.

The 4:1 aspect ratio cap is ours, not ASHRAE's.

The phrase "aspect ratio" does not appear in the chapter these equations come from. The cap reflects cost and fan-energy penalties that rise with perimeter, and it is applied as our convention with the reasoning stated rather than attributed to a standard.

Fitting losses are not included.

Bends, transitions, takeoffs and dampers frequently dominate the index run, and their loss coefficients depend on the specific geometry. This sizes straight duct only.

Preliminary sizing for schematic design, not construction documentation. It takes no account of fittings, balancing, acoustics, available void depth, fire dampers or the fan pressure the index run actually requires.

Frequently asked questions

What is the equal-friction method?
Sizing every duct in a system so the pressure drop per metre is the same throughout, rather than sizing each run to a velocity. It is the usual first pass for low-velocity commercial systems because it tends to produce a reasonably balanced system without iteration. It does not guarantee balance — the index run still governs the fan pressure, and a system with very unequal run lengths will still need balancing dampers.
How does this differ from a ductulator wheel?
A ductulator reads off a chart drawn for one material — galvanised steel at 0.09 mm absolute roughness — and standard air. This solves the same equations directly, so you can change the material and the roughness follows. The friction factor comes from Colebrook–White, iterated to convergence rather than approximated: Swamee–Jain supplies the starting estimate, but the answer returned is Colebrook's.
Why is the aspect ratio capped at 4:1?
That cap is our applied convention, not a figure from a standard, and the reasoning is worth stating rather than hiding. A flatter duct carrying the same air has a longer perimeter, so it costs more in sheet metal, insulation and hangers, and it has more surface for friction to act on — so it needs more fan power for the same duty. Past about 4:1 those penalties grow quickly. If your ceiling void genuinely forces a flatter duct, the calculation still works; you are just trading cost and fan energy for depth, and it is better to make that trade knowingly.
Why is stainless steel not in the material list?
Because it is not in the roughness table this calculator is built from. The ASHRAE Handbook—Fundamentals duct-design chapter, Table 1, lists uncoated carbon steel, PVC, aluminium, galvanised steel in several joint configurations, fibrous glass, flexible duct and concrete. Stainless is absent, and no substitute published table was obtained, so it is not offered rather than given a guessed value. Stainless is usually smoother than galvanised, so using the aluminium or carbon steel figure of 0.03 mm would be defensible as a sensitivity check — but that is your judgement to make, not a number this tool should assert.
Can I use this for construction drawings?
No. It is preliminary sizing for schematic design. It takes no account of fittings and their loss coefficients, which frequently dominate the index run; nor of balancing, acoustics, the available void, fire dampers, or the actual fan pressure required. Use it to establish sensible sizes early, then size properly against the real layout.